Domestic and foreign value added in exports in the era of global value chains: data from Russia
https://doi.org/10.46554/1993-0453-2023-9-227-9-23
Abstract
The study presents an analysis of data on value-added trade provided by ICIO OECD and ADB MRIO, investigates a set of value-added indicators to determine the dynamics of internal and external components of exports and to illustrate direct and inverse links of Russia in global value chains. It is noted that in conditions of economic shocks, knowledge of the geographical origin of value added in exports contributes to faster political decision-making and the earliest restoration or replacement of affected links in the global value chains. The article also considers issues of the share of foreign and domestic value added in Russian exports and how certain sectors of the Russian economy are integrated into the global value chains.
About the Author
M. V. Shatunov
Saint Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Mikhail V. Shatunov – postgraduate student of the Department of World Economics
References
1. The impact of exports on innovation: theory and evidence / P.W. Aghion, A. Bergeaud, M. Lequen, M.J. Melitz // NBER Working Paper. 2018. No. 24600.
2. Interconnected economies: benefiting from global value chains // OECD. 2013. 272 p. URL: https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/interconnected-economies_9789264189560-en#page4 (date of access: 17.08.2023).
3. Koopman R., Wang Z., Wei S. Tracing value-added and double counting in gross exports // American Economic Review. 2014. No. 104 (2). Pp. 459–494.
4. Havranek T., Irsova Z. Estimating vertical spillovers from FDI: why results vary and what the true effect is // Journal of International Economics. 2011. No. 85. Pp. 234–244. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2011.07.004 (date of access: 17.08.2023).
5. Tian K., Dietzenbacher E., Jong-A-Pin R. Global value chain participation and its impact on industrial upgrading // World Economy. 2022. No. 45 (5). Pp. 1362–1385.
6. World development report 2020: trading for development in the age of global value chains / World Bank. URL: https://safety4sea.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/World-Bank-Trading-for-development-inthe-age-of-global-value-chains-2019_11.pdf (date of access: 17.08.2023).
7. Hummels D., Jun I., Kei-Mu Yi. The nature and growth of vertical specialization in world trade // Journal of International Economics. 2001. No. 54. Pp. 75–96.
8. Analyzing the U.S. content of imports and the foreign content of exports / Committee on Analyzing the U.S. Content of Imports and the Foreign Content of Exports [et al.]. Washington, D.C. : The National Academies Press, 2006.
9. Koopman R., Wang Z., Wei S. Give credit where credit is due: tracing value added in global production chains // NBER Working Paper. 2010. No. 16426.
10. Johnson R.C., Noguera G. Accounting for intermediates: production sharing and trade in value added // International Economy. 2012. No. 86 (2). Pp. 224–236.
11. Daudin G., Rifflart C., Schweisguth D. Who produces for whom in the world economy? // Canadian Journal of Economics. 2011. No. 44 (4). Pp. 1403–1437.
12. Foster-McGregor N., Stehrer R. Value added content of trade: a comprehensive approach // Economics Letters. 2013. No. 120 (2). Pp. 354–357.
13. Nagengast A., Stehrer R. Accounting for the differences between gross and value added trade balances // The World Economy. 2016. No. 39 (9). Pp. 1276–1306.
14. Borin A., Mancini M. Follow the value added: bilateral gross export accounting // Banca d’Italia Working Papers. 2015. No. 1026.
15. Borin A., Mancini M. Measuring what matters in global value chains and value-added trade // World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. 2019. No. 8804.
16. Global value chains in agriculture and food: a synthesis of OECD analysis // OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers. 2020. No. 139. URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/6e3993fa-en (date of access: 17.08.2023).
17. Constantinesucu C., Matto A., Ruta M. Does vertical specialization increase productivity // World Economy. 2019. No. 42. Pp. 2385–2402.
18. Veeramani C., Dhir G. Do developing countries gain by participating in global value chains? Evidence from India // Review of World Economics. 2022. No. 158. Pp. 1011–1042. URL: https://doi.org//10.1007/s10290-021-00452-z (date of access: 17.08.2023).
19. Amiti M., Konings J. Trade liberalization, intermediate inputs, and productivity: evidence from Indonesia // American Economic Review. 2007. No. 97 (5). Pp. 1611–1638.
20. Pane D.D., Patunru A. The role of imported inputs in firms’ productivity and exports: evidence from Indonesia // Review of World Economics. 2022. No. 159. Pp. 629–672. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-022-00476-z (date of access: 17.08.2023).
21. Imported intermediate inputs and domestic product growth: evidence from India / P. Goldberg, A.K. Khandelwal, N. Pavcnik, P. Topalova // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2010. No. 125 (4). Pp. 1727–1767.
22. Bas M., Strauss-Kahn V. Does importing more inputs raise exports? Firm-level evidence from France // Review of World Economics. 2014. No. 150 (2). Pp. 241–275. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-013-0175-0 (date of access: 17.08.2023).
23. Kasahara H., Rodrigue J. Does the use of imported intermediates increase productivity? Plant-level evidence // Journal of Development Economics. 2008. No. 87 (1). Pp. 106–118. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2007.12.008 (date of access: 17.08.2023).
24. Halpern L., Koren M., Szeidl A. Imported inputs and productivity // American Economic Review. 2015. No. 105 (12). Pp. 3660–3703. URL: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20150443 (date of access: 17.08.2023).
25. Damijan J.P., Konings J., Polanec S. Import churning and export performance of multi-product firms // The World Economy. 2014. No. 37 (11). Pp. 1483–1506. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12196 (date of access: 17.08.2023).
26. Fan H., Li Y.A., Yeaple S.R. Trade liberalization, quality, and export prices // The Review of Economics and Statistics. 2015. No. 97 (5). Pp. 1033–1051. URL: https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00524 (date of access: 17.08.2023).
27. Antràs P., Chor D. Global value chains // Handbook of International Economics. Elsevier, 2022. Pp. 297–376.
28. Characterizing global value chains: production length and upstreamness / Z. Wang, S.-J. Wei, X. Yu, K. Zhu // NBER Working Papers. 2016. No. 23261.
29. Measures of participation in global value chains and global business cycles / Z. Wang, S.-J. Wei, X. Yu, K. Zhu // NBER Working Paper. 2017. No. 23222. URL: https://www.nber.org/papers/w23222 (date of access: 17.08.2023).
30. World investment report 2013 : Global value chains: investment and trade for development / The United Nations. 2013. 236 p.
31. Yanikkaya H., Altun A. Impacts of participation in export value chains on TFP growth // Ege Academic Review 2019. No. 19 (1). Pp. 119–129.
32. Yanikkaya H., Altun A. The impact of global value chain participation on sectoral growth and productivity // Sustainability. 2020. No. 12.
33. Kee H.L., Tang H. Domestic value added in exports: theory and firm evidence from China // American Economic Review. 2016. No. 106 (6). Pp. 1402–1436.
34. Dollar D., Khan B., Pei J. Should high domestic value added in exports be an objective of policy? // Global Value Chain Development Report 2019: Technological Innovation, Supply Chain Trade, and Workers in a Globalized World. 2019. Pp. 141–153.
35. Durongkaveroj W. Emphasis on domestic value added in export in the era of global value chain: evidence from Thailand // Journal of Industrial and Business Economics. 2023. No. 50. Pp. 703–729. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-022-00239-9 (date of access: 17.08.2023).
36. Kummritz V. Global value chains, labour productivity, and GDP: evidence from input‐output tables in three essays on global value chains // Diss. PhD Thesis. Geneva, Switzerland, 2017.
37. Formai S., Caffarelli F.V. Quantifying the productivity effects of global value chains // Cambridge Working Papers in Economics. 2015. No. 1564.
Review
For citations:
Shatunov M.V. Domestic and foreign value added in exports in the era of global value chains: data from Russia. Vestnik of Samara State University of Economics. 2023;(9):9-23. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46554/1993-0453-2023-9-227-9-23
Views:
3
Email this article 