Impact of economic shocks on the reproduction system during the transition to a neo-industrial structural shift
Abstract
The article examines a problem of impact of economic shocks on the structure of the reproductive system that ensures neo-industrial transformation of the economy. Approaches to analyzing the structure of reproduction and its role in initiating structural changes, which can be both neo-industrial and de-industrial in nature, are considered, which ultimately determines the stability of the economy to external and internal shocks of endogenous and exogenous nature. The role of modification of economic relations in the reproduction system is shown, their new subjects necessary to initiate neo-industrial structural shift are identified, during which a basis for the resistance of the economy to shocks is being formed. The research methodology includes approaches to studying the structure of reproduction processes and the impact of endogenous and exogenous shocks on them, the main of which are investment and technological ones, respectively, as well as approaches to the development of economic relations in the reproduction system, presented in leading schools of economic theory. In the article, particular attention is paid to the creation of reproductive conditions for the reduction of exogenous technological shocks that determine neo-industrial changes in the structure of production factors and the ratio of their effectiveness.
About the Author
O. G. Aleshina
Siberian Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Olga G. Aleshina – Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the University,
Krasnoyarsk.
References
1. Gordeev V.A. Research of social reproduction – a fundamental basis for the development of theoretical economics // Theoretical Economics. 2022. No. 1 (85). Pp. 130–135.
2. Zhdanova L.L. Discussion issues in the theory of reproduction and accumulation of capital // Journal of Economic Theory. 2019. No. 1. Pp. 154–168.
3. Slesarenko G.V. Application of indicators of reproduction of fixed assets in assessing the efficiency of their use // Bulletin of the Udmurt University. Series "Economics and Law". 2021. No. 2. Pp. 221–225.
4. Indan A.A. The role of the state in the process of reproduction of fixed assets of industrial enterprises // Innovations and investments. 2019. No. 10. Pp. 180–182.
5. Korepanov E.N. Reproduction of the scientific and technical potential of the Russian Federation: problems and prospects // Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2021. No. 3. Pp. 133–145.
6. Terelyansky P.V., Malkarova S.M. Institutional trap of reproduction of intellectual capital // Open education. 2023. No. 2. Pp. 49–60.
7. Dyatlov S.A., Khankhunova A.Yu. Features of transformation of the system of reproduction of human capital in the digital economy // News of St. Petersburg State Economic University. 2019. No. 2 (116). Pp. 14–17.
8. Nazarova E.V., Gribina E.N. Human capital: analysis of methodological approaches to formation and reproduction // Society: politics, economics, law. 2022. No. 6 (107). Pp. 68–74.
9. Antipov V.I., Mitin N.A. Two axiomatics of used GDP // Innovative science. 2015. No. 12. Pp. 33–40.
10. Pilnik N.P., Radionov S.A., Stankevich I.P. Generalized multi-product decomposition of elements of the use of Russia’s GDP // HSE Economic Journal. 2018. No. 2. Pp. 251–254.
11. Kuzbozhev E.N., Skulova G.G., Shugaeva O.V. Modeling sustainable expanded reproduction // Economic analysis: theory and practice. 2011. No. 16. Pp. 2–11.
12. Matveeva M.V. Genesis of management concepts for managing expanded reproduction // News of universities. Investments. Construction. Real estate. 2014. No. 6 (11). Pp. 30–39.
13. Larshina T.L. Development of the theory of reproduction // Socio-economic phenomena and processes. 2015. No. 11. Pp. 36–42.
14. Gordon R.J. What Is New-Keynesian Economics? // Journal of Eco-nomic Literature. 1990. Vol. 28. Pp. 1115–1171.
15. Mayevsky V.I., Malkov S.Yu. A new look at the theory of reproduction : monograph. Moscow : Infra-M, 2014. 238 p.
16. Chermit Z.Sh. Theoretical features of reproduction, its types and types // New technologies. 2009. No. 4. Pp. 36–38.
17. Adamidov D.Yu. Three-sector model of social reproduction // STAGE: economic theory, analysis, practice. 2017. No. 5. Pp. 101–120.
18. Antipov V.I., Mitin N.A. New model of reproduction of gross domestic product // Innovative science. 2016. No. 3-4 (15). Pp. 30–38.
19. Mau V.A. Economic policy in a pandemic: experience 2021–2022 // Economic Issues. 2022. No. 3. Pр. 5–28.
20. Sukharev O.S. Neo-Schumpeterian direction in economic science: modern research // Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2021. No. 1. Pр. 71–85.
21. Yusim V.N., Filippov V.S. The Cobb-Douglas production function and the management of economic and technological development // Bulletin of Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. 2018. No. 2 (98). Pp. 105–114.
22. Lucas R. On the mechanism of economic development // Journal of Monetary economics. 1988. Vol. Pp. 3–42.
23. Solow R.M. A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth // The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1956. Vol. 70, No.1. Pp. 65–94.
24. Byrda N.A., Zakharova T.I. Financial sector of Russia under sanctions // Innovations and investments. 2023. No. 5. Pp. 213–216.
25. Aleshina O.G. The core of the neo-industrial structural shift in the system of increasing the economic stability to external shocks // Vestnik of Samara State University of Economics. 2022. No. 11 (217). Pp. 9–18.
Review
For citations:
Aleshina O.G. Impact of economic shocks on the reproduction system during the transition to a neo-industrial structural shift. Vestnik of Samara State University of Economics. 2024;(2):9-17. (In Russ.)
Views:
5
Email this article 