Environmental and technological projects as an instrument of industrial policy in Industry 5.0 conditions
Abstract
In the conditions of Industry 5.0, industrial integration, which affects the interests of all stakeholders in the territory where industrial enterprises are present, must be studied and assessed from the perspective of the trinity of economic (technological), environmental and social efficiency. An effective tool for implementing the policy of technological sovereignty and sustainable development of the industrial sector are environmental and technological projects that comply with the principles of the best available technologies. The article suggests factors that should be taken into account when selecting environmental and technological projects, as well as the main directions for their assessment, ensuring the achievement of economic, environmental and social development goals and contributing to the technological sovereignty of the domestic economy. The authors analyzed a number of cases describing projects implemented by industrial clusters and symbioses operating in various regions of the Russian Federation, from the perspective of their compliance with the above factors. Problems and promising directions of environmental and technological transformation of domestic industrial production in modern realities have been identified.
About the Authors
L. A. Gamidullaeva
Penza State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Leyla A. Gamidullaeva
Doctor of Economics, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Management and Public Administration
Penza
T. O. Tolstykh
National Research Technological University "MISIS"
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tatyana O. Tolstykh
Doctor of Economics, Professor, Professor
Moscow
N. V. Shmeleva
National Research Technological University "MISIS"
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nadezhda V. Shmeleva
Doctor of Economics, Associate Professor, Associate Professor
Moscow
References
1. On technological policy in the Russian Federation : draft federal law (prepared by the Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation on 25.09.2023). URL: https://base.garant.ru/56971732/ (date of access: 16.11.2023).
2. On approval of the concept of technological development for the period up to 2030 : decree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated 20.05.2023 No. 1315-r. URL: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_447895/ (date of access: 16.11.2023).
3. On the national development goals of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2030 : decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated 21.07.2020 No. 474. URL: https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/74304210/ (date of access: 16.11.2023).
4. On industrial policy in the Russian Federation : federal law No. 488-FZ of December 31, 2014. URL: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_173119/ (date of access: 16.11.2023).
5. Gamidullayeva L.A. The industrial cluster of the region as a localized ecosystem: the role of self-organization and collaboration factors // π-Economy. 2023. Vol. 16, No. 1. Pp. 62–82. doi:10.18721/JE.16105.
6. The role of collaboration in the development of industrial enterprise integration / T.O. Tolstykh, N.V. Shmeleva, L.A. Gamidullayeva, V.S. Krasnobaeva // Models, systems, networks in economics, technology, nature and society. 2023. No. 1. Pp. 5–36. doi:10.21685/2227-8486-2023-1-1.
7. Atlas of Industry // State information system of industry : [website]. URL: https://gisp.gov.ru/gisip/ #!ru/clusters/221/ (date of access: 16.11.2023).
8. Green cases / [edited by D.O. Skobelev] ; Scientific research institute "Center for industrial environmental policy". Moscow : Business Express, 2020. 160 с. URL: http://ecoline.ru/wp-content/uploads/greencases-2020.pdf (date of access: 16.11.2023).
9. Marshall A. Industry and Trade : a study of industrial technique and business organization; and of their influences on the conditions of various classes and nations. 4th ed. London: MacMillan, 1923.
10. Weber A. Theory of the location of industries / edited by C.J. Friedrich. Chicago : The University of Chicago Press, 1929.
11. Christaller W. Die zentralen Orte in Süddeutschland = [The Central Places in Southern Germany]. Jena : Verlag von Gustav Fischer, 1933. 331 p.
12. Lösch A. The economics of location / translated by W.H. Woglom. New Haven : Yale University Press, 1954.
13. Myrdal G. Economic theory and underdeveloped regions. London : University Paperbacks, Methuen. 1957.
14. Chertow M., Lombardi R. Quantifying economic and environmental benefits of co-located firms // Environmental science and technology. 2005. No. 39. Pp. 6535–6541.
15. Korhonen J. Four ecosystem principles for an industrial ecosystem // Journal of Cleaner production. 2001. No. 9. Pp. 253–259.
16. Uzzi B. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: the network effect // American Sociological Review. 1996. No. 61. Pp. 674–698.
17. Resource efficiency: potential and economic implications : a report of the International Resource Panel / P. Ekins, N. Hughes, S. Bringezu [et al.] ; UNEP. 2017. URL: https://www.resourcepanel.org/reports/resource-efficiency (date of access: 16.11.2023).
18. Solow R.N. A contribution to the theory of economic growth // The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1956. Vol. 70, No. 1. Pp. 65–94.
19. Stieglitz J.E. People, power, and profits: progressive capitalism for an age of discontent. New York : W.W. Norton & Company, 2019. 366 p.
20. Schaltegger S., Burritt R. Contemporary environmental accounting: issues, concepts and practice. Sheffield, UK : Greenleaf Publishin, 2000.
21. Analysis on spatio-temporal characteristics and influencing factors of industrial green innovation efficiency-From the perspective of innovation value chain / P.Z. Liu, L.Y. Zhang, H. Tarbert, Z.Y. Yan // Sustainability. 202). Vol. 14, No. 342.
22. Have cities effectively improved ecological well-being performance? Empirical analysis of 278 Chinese cities / J. Bian, Y. Zhang, C. Shuai [et al.] // Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020. No. 245.
23. Robaina-Alves M., Moutinho V., Macedo P. A new frontier approach to model the eco-efficiency in European countries // Journal of Cleaner Production. 2015. No. 103. Pp. 562–573.
24. Wang X., Ding H., Liu L. Eco-efficiency measurement of industrial sectors in China: a hybrid superefficiency DEA analysis // Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019. No. 229. Pp. 53–64.
25. How technological innovation influences carbon neutrality? The perspective of spatial spillover effect and attenuation boundary / J. Tian, W. Huang, J. Peng [et al.] // Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 2023. doi:10.1080/09640568.2023.2268267.
26. Cherepovitsyn A.E., Tcvetkov P.S., Evseeva O.O. Critical analysis of methodological approaches to assessing sustainability of arctic oil and gas projects // Journal of Mining Institute. 2021. Vol. 249. Pp. 463– 479. doi:10.31897/PMI.2021.3.15.
Review
For citations:
Gamidullaeva L.A., Tolstykh T.O., Shmeleva N.V. Environmental and technological projects as an instrument of industrial policy in Industry 5.0 conditions. Vestnik of Samara State University of Economics. 2024;1(1):24-37. (In Russ.)
Views:
2
Email this article 