A game-theoretical model for conducting a public discussion of the legal regulation of entrepreneurship
Abstract
In the Russian practice of state regulation, institutions of involving economic agents in assessing the effectiveness of policies, analyzing and adjusting the regulatory environment are taking root. However, low efficiency of such tools for the purpose of reducing administrative costs and weak involvement of stakeholders in public management processes are noted. This actualizes the need to model public discussion procedures with the development of approaches to improving communications between government and business. The purpose of the article is to build a model of public consultations that provides the ability to adjust individual parameters in the practice of public administration to improve the efficiency of assessing the regulatory impact as an institution for making collective management decisions. The key research methods are institutional analysis, game-theoretic approach, and sociological survey. The features of domestic institutions for making collective decisions in public administration are analyzed. Based on game theory, a model of public consultations on draft legal acts with the civil community is built. In the game matrix, gains are presented as the difference between direct benefits and costs, taking into account lost opportunities for two players – the state and the entrepreneur (association). A condition has been found under which partnership relations are an equilibrium in dominant strategies for both parties. The results are supplemented by data from a survey of civil servants and entrepreneurs regarding their ideas about the institution of assessing legal acts. The author's developments provide the possibility of adjusting individual parameters in public administration practice to improve the effectiveness of assessing regulatory impact as an institution for making collective management decisions.
About the Authors
I. I. Rakhmeeva
Ural State University of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Irina I. Rakhmeeva – Doctor of Economics, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Economic Theory
and Applied Sociology
D. V. Filatov
Ural State University of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dmitry V. Filatov – assistant of the Department of Economic Theory and Applied Sociology
M. Yu. Andronov
Ural State University of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Mikhail Yu. Andronov – director of Development of Ascort Company, coordinator of the branch direction of MFIs
and CPC of 1C company
References
1. Polterovich V.M. The crisis of institutions of political competition, the Internet and collaborative democracy // Economic issues. 2021. No. 1. Pp. 52–72.
2. Smotritskaya I.I. Public governance: towards dialogue and cooperation? // Journal of the New Economic Association. 2023. No. 4 (61). Pp. 246–252. doi:10.31737/22212264_2023_4_246-252.
3. Talias M. Collaborative regulation: collaborative governance in regulation // Collaborative Governance. 2021. Pp. 165–189.
4. Degtyarev A.N., Malikov R.I., Grishin K.E. Joint business and authority efforts as a means of promotion to business community development // Society and Economics. 2014. No 2-3. Pp. 156–173.
5. Ilyukhin A.A., Korsakova E.A. Reforming the economy: theoretical and methodological aspect // The Journal of Economic Theory. 2018. Vol. 15, No. 2. Pp. 172–176.
6. Radchenko T., Parshina E. Regulatory impact assessment in Russia: application practice and conclusions from theory // Economic policy. 2014. No. 3. Pp. 36–60.
7. Vasilevskaya M.M., Kazantsev K.I., Shepeleva O.S. The quality of regulatory impact assessment in Russia: what does the continuous analysis of text data show? Moscow : TSPUR, 2021. 60 p.
8. The system of organization of regulatory impact assessment in the Chelyabinsk region / Ya.Yu. Kazantsev, I.Yu. Pirozhkova, I.N. Chigintseva [et al.] // Economics and Politics. 2020. No. 2 (16). Pp. 11–16.
9. Kolesnik V.O. The practice of conducting regulatory impact assessment in the Russian Federation // Civil Service and personnel. 2020. No. 5. Pp. 226–228. doi:10.24411/2312-0444-2020-10300.
10. Mamitova N.V., Petrenko A.V. Assessment of regulatory impact in the context of digitalization: modern approaches // Theory of state and law. 2022. No. 1 (26). Pp. 156–165. doi:10.47905/MATGIP.2022.125.1.013.
11. Miminoshvili R.T. Assessment of the regulatory impact in the public administration system of the Russian Federation: the current situation and ways of development // Economics and Management: problems, solutions. 2024. Vol. 1, No.2 (143). Pp. 60–67. doi:10.36871/ek.up.p.r.2024.02.01.007.
12. Shamarova G.M. Interaction of local self-government bodies with the population: domestic and foreign experience // Vestnik of Samara State University of Economics. 2021. No. 8 (202). Pp. 29–37. doi:10.46554/1993-0453-2021-8-202-29-37.
13. Nekipelov A.D. The "pure distribution" model as a research tool for the problem of group choice : report at the international scientific seminar "Theoretical economics" of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences and the New Economic Association on May 30, 2024.
14. Nekipelov A.D. On the possibility of forming an updated paradigm of individual and group choice theories // The Economy of the North-West: Problems and prospects of development. 2024. Vol. 76, No. 1. Pp. 33–43. doi:10.52897/2411-4588-2024-1-33-43.
15. Bergson A.A. Reformulation of certain aspects of welfare economics // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1938. No. 52. Pp. 310–334.
16. Federal Law "On Mandatory Requirements in the Russian Federation" dated 31.07.2020 No. 247-FZ.
17. Osborne D., Gaebler T. Catalytic government: steering rather than rowing // Reinventing government: how the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. 1992. Pp. 25–48.
18. Rakhmeeva I.I., Andronov M.Yu. Economic analysis of law: on the issue of criteria for redundancy of legal norms in the financial sphere // Modern science: actual problems of theory and practice. Series: Economics and Law. 2023. No. 10. Pp. 54–64. doi:10.37882/2223-2974.2023.10.23.
19. Olson M. The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups. London : Harward University press, 1965. 186 p.
20. Kulikov M.A. Lobbying as a form of manipulation of legal goals and means: problem statement // Bulletin of the Volga Region Institute of Management. 2023. Vol. 23, No. 1. Pp. 44–51. doi:10.22394/1682-2358-2023-1-44-51.
21. Korovin G.B. Theoretical model of the multisubject industrial policy // Bulletin of UrFU. Series Economics and Management. 2017. Vol. 16, No. 5. Pp. 744–759. doi:10.15826/vestnik.2017.16.5.036.
22. Rakhmeeva I.I. Regional regulatory environment: at the crossroads : monograph / Ural State University of Economics. Ekaterinburg : Ural State University of Economics Publishing House, 2021. 210 p.
23. Barykin A.N., Islyaev T.R., Kolesnik A.Yu. GR-rating for 2022: 100 largest Russian companies without government participation. Ridero, Moscow, 2024. 144 p.
24. Komarova O.V., Kuklinova P.S. Methodological aspects of assessing the level of R&D 2.0 development in the regions: problems and challenges // Management in modern systems. 2023. No. 4 (40). Pp. 29–43. doi:10.24412/2311-1313-40-29-43.
25. Konovalova M.E., Litovchenko V.A. Institutional features of the stock market functioning // Economics and entrepreneurship. 2023. No. 11 (160). Pp. 39–42. doi:10.34925/EIP.2023.160.11.004.
26. Evidence-based approach in management: evidence-based management and policy / G.V. Semya, V.V. Stanilevsky, A.A. Gazaryan, A.S. Nekrasov // Social psychology and Society. 2022. Vol. 13, No. 1. Pp. 209–223. doi:10.17759/sps.2022000001.
27. Soloviev A.I. "Evidence-based policy" and "policy of evidence": the dilemma of post-soviet societies // Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 2021. Vol. 14, No. 5. Pp. 61–80. doi:10.23932/2542-0240-2021-14-5-3.
28. Skarzhinskaya E.M., Tzurikov V.I. The endogenous formation of leadership in collective actions using the modified timing decisions algorithm // Journal of the New Economic Association. 2023. No. 4 (61). Pp. 51–68. doi:10.31737/22212264_2023_4_51-68.
29. Iskakov M.B., Iskakov A.B. Equilibrium in sequre strategies as a development of the concept of Nash equilibrium // Mathematical game theory and its applications. 2023. Vol. 15, No. 1. Pp. 48–72.
30. Rastorguev S.V. Evolutionary games as models of regional political processes // Proceedings of Tula State University. Humanitarian sciences. 2022. No. 1. Pp. 99–109. doi:10.24412/2071-6141-2022-1-99-109.
31. Game-theoretic method of rationalization of investment policy of economic entities / D.G. Rodionov, A.A. Zaitsev, N.D. Dmitriev, N.G. Viktorova // Business. Education. Law. 2023. No. 2 (63). Pp. 109–117. doi:10.25683/VOLBI.2023.63.614.
32. Bombardini M., Trebbi F. Empirical models of lobbying // Annual Review of Economics. 2020. No 12 (1). Pp. 391–413.
33. Kang K. Policy influence and private returns from lobbying in the energy sector // The Review of Economic Studies. 2016. No. 83 (1). Pp. 269–305.
34. Pecorino P. Is there a free-rider problem in lobbying? Endogenous tariffs, trigger strategies, and the number of firms // The American economic review. 1998. No 88 (3). Pp. 652–660.
35. Petrosyan L.A., Zenkevich N.A. Game theory and socio-economic behavior // The economic school. Analytical application. 2002. Vol. 1, No. 1. Pp. 119–131.
36. Technologies and trends of accounting, reporting and control in the context of the development of the digital environment of public administration / R.S. Blizky, Yu.Zh. Budaeva, V.A. Dolgushina, S.V. Gulua // Accounting in healthcare. 2023. No 4. Pp. 5-17. doi:10.33920/med-17-2304-01.
Review
For citations:
Rakhmeeva I.I., Filatov D.V., Andronov M.Yu. A game-theoretical model for conducting a public discussion of the legal regulation of entrepreneurship. Vestnik of Samara State University of Economics. 2025;(3):17-30. (In Russ.)
Views:
2
Email this article 